Mine atom. The crew of the submarine "Pike" found in the Black Sea fought for life for four days. Full list of the dead Legends about sunken submarines
Water and cold. Darkness.
And somewhere above there was the sound of metal.
I don’t have the strength to say: we are here, here...
Hope is gone, I'm tired of waiting.
The bottomless ocean reliably keeps its secrets. Somewhere out there, under the dark arches of the waves, lie the wreckage of thousands of ships, each of which has its own unique fate and tragic death.
In 1963, the thickness of sea water crushed the most modern American submarine "Thresher". Half a century ago, this was hard to believe - the invincible Poseidon, who drew strength from the flames of a nuclear reactor and was able to circumnavigate the globe without a single ascent, turned out to be weak as a worm before the onslaught of the merciless elements.
“We have a positive increasing angle... We are trying to blow through... 900... north” - the last message from the Thresher is unable to convey all the horror that the dying submariners experienced. Who could have imagined that a two-day test voyage accompanied by the rescue tug Skylark could end in such a disaster?
The cause of the Thrasher's death remains a mystery. The main hypothesis: when diving to the maximum depth, water entered the durable hull of the boat - the reactor was automatically shut down, and the submarine, unable to move, fell into the abyss, taking with it 129 human lives.
Rudder blade USS Tresher (SSN-593)
Soon the terrible story continued - the Americans lost another nuclear-powered ship with its crew: in 1968, it disappeared without a trace in the Atlantic multi-purpose nuclear submarine "Scorpion".
Unlike the Thrasher, with which sound underwater communication was maintained until the last second, the death of the Scorpion was complicated by the lack of any clear idea of the coordinates of the disaster site. Unsuccessful searches continued for five months until the Yankees deciphered data from deep-sea stations of the SOSUS system (a network of hydrophone buoys of the US Navy for tracking Soviet submarines) - on the records dated May 22, 1968, a loud bang was discovered, similar to the destruction of the durable hull of a submarine. Next, using the triangulation method, the approximate location of the lost boat was restored.
Wreck of USS Scorpion (SSN-589). Visible deformations from the monstrous water pressure (30 tons/sq. meter)
The wreckage of the Scorpio was discovered at a depth of 3,000 meters in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean, 740 km southwest of the Azores. The official version connects the death of the boat with the detonation of torpedo ammunition (almost like the Kursk!). There is a more exotic legend, according to which the Scorpion was sunk by the Russians in retaliation for the death of the K-129.
The mystery of the death of the Scorpion still haunts the minds of sailors - in November 2012, the Organization of Veteran Submariners of the US Navy proposed launching a new investigation to establish the truth about the death of the American boat.
Less than 48 hours had passed since the wreckage of the American Scorpio sank to the seabed, and a new tragedy occurred in the ocean. On experimental nuclear submarine K-27 The Soviet Navy's reactor with liquid metal coolant went out of control. The nightmare unit, in whose veins molten lead was boiling, “contaminated” all the compartments with radioactive emissions, the crew received terrible doses of radiation, 9 submariners died from acute radiation sickness. Despite the severe radiation accident, Soviet sailors managed to bring the boat to the base in Gremikha.
K-27 turned into an ineffective heap of metal with positive buoyancy, emitting deadly gamma rays. The decision on the future fate of the unique ship hung in the air; finally, in 1981, it was decided to sink the damaged submarine in one of the bays on Novaya Zemlya. As a keepsake for posterity. Maybe they will find a way to safely dispose of the floating Fukushima?
But long before the “last dive” of K-27, the group of nuclear submarines at the bottom of the Atlantic was replenished submarine K-8. One of the first-born of the nuclear fleet, the third nuclear submarine in the ranks of the USSR Navy, which sank during a fire in the Bay of Biscay on April 12, 1970. For 80 hours there was a struggle for the survivability of the ship, during which time the sailors managed to shut down the reactors and evacuate part of the crew on board the approaching Bulgarian ship.
The death of K-8 and 52 submariners became the first official loss of the Soviet nuclear fleet. Currently, the wreckage of the nuclear-powered ship rests at a depth of 4,680 meters, 250 miles off the coast of Spain.
In the 1980s, the USSR Navy lost a couple more nuclear submarines in combat campaigns - the strategic missile submarine K-219 and the unique “titanium” submarine K-278 Komsomolets.
K-219 with a torn missile silo
The most dangerous situation arose around the K-219 - on board the submarine, in addition to two nuclear reactors, there were 15 R-21 submarine-launched ballistic missiles* with 45 thermonuclear warheads. On October 3, 1986, missile silo No. 6 depressurized, which led to the explosion of a ballistic missile. The crippled ship demonstrated fantastic survivability, managing to emerge from a depth of 350 meters, with damage to the pressure hull and a flooded fourth (missile) compartment.
* the project assumed a total of 16 SLBMs, but in 1973 a similar incident already occurred on the K-219 - the explosion of a liquid-propellant rocket. As a result, the “unlucky” boat remained in service, but lost launch shaft No. 15.
Three days after the rocket explosion, the heavily armed nuclear-powered submarine sank in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean at a depth of 5 kilometers. The disaster killed 8 people. It happened on October 6, 1986
Three years later, on April 7, 1989, another Soviet submarine, the K-278 Komsomolets, sank to the bottom of the Norwegian Sea. An unsurpassed ship with a titanium hull, capable of diving to depths of over 1000 meters.
K-278 "Komsomolets" at the bottom of the Norwegian Sea. The photographs were taken by the Mir deep-sea submersible.
Alas, no exorbitant performance characteristics saved the Komsomolets - the submarine became a victim of a banal fire, complicated by the lack of clear ideas about the tactics of fighting for survivability on kingless boats. 42 sailors died in the burning compartments and icy water. The nuclear submarine sank at a depth of 1,858 meters, becoming the subject of a furious debate between shipbuilders and sailors in a bid to find the “culprit”.
New times have brought new problems. The orgy of the “free market”, multiplied by “limited funding”, the destruction of the fleet supply system and the mass dismissal of experienced submariners inevitably led to disaster. And she didn’t keep her waiting.
August 12, 2000 no contact Nuclear submarine K-141 "Kursk". The official cause of the tragedy is the spontaneous explosion of a “long” torpedo. Unofficial versions range from a nightmarish heresy in the style of “Submarine in Troubled Waters” from the French director Jean Michel Carré to quite plausible hypotheses about a collision with the aircraft-carrying cruiser Admiral Kuznetsov or a torpedo fired from the American submarine Toledo (the motive is unclear).
The nuclear submarine cruiser is an “aircraft carrier killer” with a displacement of 24 thousand tons. The depth where the submarine sank was 108 meters, 118 people were locked in the “steel coffin”...
The epic with the unsuccessful operation to rescue the crew from the Kursk lying on the ground shocked the whole of Russia. We all remember the smiling face of another scoundrel with admiral’s shoulder straps smiling on TV: “The situation is under control. Contact has been established with the crew, and air supply has been provided to the emergency boat.”
Then there was an operation to raise the Kursk. The first compartment was sawn off (for what??), a letter from Captain Kolesnikov was found... was there a second page? Someday we will know the truth about those events. And, for sure, we will be very surprised at our naivety.
On August 30, 2003, another tragedy occurred, hidden in the gray twilight of naval everyday life - it sank while being towed for cutting. old nuclear submarine K-159. The reason is loss of buoyancy due to the poor technical condition of the boat. It still lies at a depth of 170 meters near the island of Kildin, on the approach to Murmansk.
The question of lifting and disposing of this radioactive pile of metal is periodically raised, but so far the matter has not moved beyond words.
In total, today the wreckage of seven nuclear submarines lies on the bottom of the World Ocean:
Two American: “Thrasher” and “Scorpio”
Five Soviet: K-8, K-27, K-219, K-278 and K-159.
However, this is not a complete list. In the history of the Russian Navy, there are a number of other incidents that were not reported by TASS, in each of which nuclear submarines were lost.
For example, on August 20, 1980, a serious accident occurred in the Philippine Sea - 14 sailors died fighting a fire on board the K-122. The crew was able to save their nuclear submarine and bring the burnt boat in tow to their home base. Unfortunately, the damage received was such that restoring the boat was deemed impractical. After 15 years of storage, K-122 was disposed of at the Zvezda Shipyard.
Another severe incident, known as the “radiation accident in Chazhma Bay,” occurred in 1985 in the Far East. During the process of recharging the reactor of the nuclear submarine K-431, the floating crane swayed on the wave and “teared out” the control grids from the submarine’s reactor. The reactor turned on and instantly reached an extreme operating mode, turning into a “dirty atomic bomb,” the so-called. "fizzy" In a bright flash, 11 officers standing nearby disappeared. According to eyewitnesses, the 12-ton reactor cover flew up a couple of hundred meters and then fell again on the boat, almost cutting it in half. The outbreak of a fire and emissions of radioactive dust finally turned the K-431 and the nearby nuclear submarine K-42 into unsuitable floating coffins. Both damaged nuclear submarines were scrapped.
When it comes to accidents on nuclear submarines, one cannot fail to mention the K-19, which received the telling nickname “Hiroshima” in the navy. The boat became a source of serious problems at least four times. The first combat campaign and the reactor accident on July 3, 1961 are especially memorable. K-19 was heroically saved, but the episode with the reactor almost cost the life of the first Soviet missile carrier.
Having read the list of dead submarines, the average person may have a vile conviction: the Russians do not know how to control ships. The accusation is serious. The Yankees lost only two nuclear submarines - Thresher and Scorpion. At the same time, the domestic fleet lost almost a dozen nuclear submarines, not counting diesel-electric submarines (the Yankees have not built diesel-electric boats since the 1950s). How to explain this paradox? The fact that the nuclear-powered ships of the USSR Navy were controlled by crooked Russian Mongols?
Something tells me that there is another explanation for the paradox. Let's try to find it together.
It is worth noting that an attempt to “blame” all failures on the difference in the number of nuclear submarines in the compositions of the USSR Navy and the US Navy is obviously useless. In total, during the existence of the nuclear submarine fleet, about 250 submarines passed through the hands of our sailors (from K-3 to the modern Borey), while the Americans had slightly fewer of them - ≈ 200 units. However, the Yankees had nuclear-powered ships earlier and were operated two to three times more intensively (just look at the operational stress coefficient of SSBNs: 0.17 - 0.24 for ours and 0.5 - 0.6 for American missile carriers). Obviously, the whole point is not the number of boats... But then what?
Much depends on the calculation method. As the old joke goes: “It doesn’t matter how you did it, the main thing is how you calculated it.” A thick trail of fatal accidents and emergencies stretches through the entire history of the nuclear fleet, regardless of the submarine’s flag.
On February 9, 2001, the US Navy multi-purpose nuclear submarine Greenville rammed the Japanese fishing schooner Ehime Maru. Nine Japanese fishermen were killed, and the US Navy submarine fled the scene without providing any assistance to those in distress.
Nonsense! - the Yankees will answer. Navigation incidents are everyday life in any fleet. In the summer of 1973, the Soviet nuclear submarine K-56 collided with the scientific vessel Akademik Berg. 27 sailors died.
But the Russians' boats sank right at the pier! Here you are:
On September 13, 1985, K-429 lay down on the ground at the pier in Krasheninnikov Bay.
So what?! - our sailors may object. The Yankees had the same case:
On May 15, 1969, the US Navy nuclear submarine Guitarro sank right next to the quay wall. The reason is simple negligence.
USS Guitarro (SSN-655) lay down to rest at the pier
Americans will scratch their heads and remember how on May 8, 1982, the central post of the nuclear submarine K-123 (“underwater fighter” of the 705th project, a reactor with liquid liquid fuel) received an original report: “I see silvery metal spreading across the deck.” The first circuit of the reactor ruptured, the radioactive alloy of lead and bismuth “stained” the boat so much that it took 10 years to clean up K-123. Fortunately, none of the sailors died then.
The Russians will only smile sadly and tactfully hint to the Americans how the USS Dace (SSN-607) accidentally “splashed” two tons of radioactive liquid from the primary circuit into the Thames (a river in the USA), “dirting” the entire Groton naval base.
Stop!
We won't achieve anything this way. There is no point in denigrating each other and remembering ugly moments from history.
It is clear that a huge fleet of hundreds of ships serves as rich soil for various emergencies - every day there is smoke somewhere, something falls, explodes or lands on rocks.
The true indicator is major accidents that lead to the loss of ships. “Thresher”, “Scorpion”,... Are there any other cases where nuclear-powered ships of the US Navy received heavy damage during military campaigns and were forever excluded from the fleet?
Yes, such cases have happened.
USS San Francisco (SSN-711) smashed to pieces. Consequences of a collision with an underwater rock at 30 knots
In 1986, the US Navy strategic missile carrier Nathaniel Greene crashed on rocks in the Irish Sea. The damage to the hull, rudders and ballast tanks was so great that the boat had to be scrapped.
February 11, 1992. Barencevo sea. The multi-purpose nuclear submarine Baton Rouge collided with the Russian titanium Barracuda. The boats collided successfully - repairs on the B-276 took six months, and the story of the USS Baton Rouge (SSN-689) turned out to be much sadder. The collision with a Russian titanium boat led to the appearance of stresses and microcracks in the submarine’s durable hull. "Baton Rouge" hobbled to the base and soon ceased to exist.
"Baton Rouge" goes to the nails
It's not fair! – the attentive reader will notice. The Americans had purely navigational errors; there were practically no accidents on US Navy ships with damage to the reactor core. In the Russian Navy, everything is different: compartments are burning, molten coolant is gushing onto the deck. There are design flaws and improper operation of the equipment.
And it is true. The domestic submarine fleet has traded reliability for exorbitant technical characteristics of boats. The design of submarines of the USSR Navy has always been distinguished by a high degree of novelty and a large number of innovative solutions. Testing of new technologies was often carried out directly in combat campaigns. The fastest (K-222), deepest (K-278), largest (project 941 “Shark”) and most secretive boat (project 945A “Condor”) were created in our country. And if there is nothing to blame “Condor” and “Akula” for, then the operation of the other “record holders” was regularly accompanied by major technical problems.
Was this the right decision: immersion depth in exchange for reliability? We have no right to answer this question. History does not know the subjunctive mood, the only thing I wanted to convey to the reader: the high accident rate on Soviet submarines is not the miscalculations of the designers or the mistakes of the crews. Often it was inevitable. A high price paid for the unique characteristics of submarines.
Project 941 strategic missile submarine
Memorial to fallen submariners, Murmansk
Raising a sunken submarine
Already on September 27, 1957, by order of the USSR Minister of Defense No. 0232, a commission was appointed to investigate the circumstances and causes of the death of M-256. Army General Antonov was appointed chairman of the commission, members: vice admirals Ivanov and Komarov, vice admiral engineer Kozmin, rear admirals Simonov and Skorodubov and colonel of justice Viktorov.
The commission immediately flew to Tallinn and began work on September 28. In the process of work, all surviving personnel of the M-256, the commanders of the ships that took part in the rescue operations, as well as all persons who were in one way or another related to the events related to the death of the submarine were interviewed. In addition, the chief designer of Project A615 submarines and officers of similar submarines were heard. To consider special issues, the commission created technical and expert commissions with the inclusion of relevant specialists in their composition.
From the act of the state commission: “On September 26, 1957, the submarine M-256 of the 70th submarine division, under the command of captain 3rd rank Vavakin Yu. S., in accordance with the combat training plan, at 11.00 o’clock left Bekkerovskaya harbor (area Tallinn) to the F-18 test site, located 4 miles northeast of the Vimsi Peninsula, with the task of determining fuel consumption in a submerged position in various modes. The personnel of the M-256 submarine were prepared to properly operate the equipment and perform the tasks assigned to them. The material part of the submarine was technically sound.
Conclusions and offers:
1. It is not possible to establish the causes of the fire and death of the submarine before it is raised and inspected.
2. According to the data available to the commission, the material part of the submarine M-256, before it went to sea, was in good working order and the personnel were prepared to service the mechanisms...
3. The Commission notes that the Ministry of Shipbuilding Industry has not yet completed the most important work to study the causes of accidents on the Project A-615 submarine when engines operate in a closed cycle, as provided for by the joint decision of the Navy and SMEs dated October 27, 1956 No. 00138.
4. Until the causes of the death of the M-256 submarine are established, the navigation of Project A-615 submarines, in the opinion of the commission, should be prohibited.”
Now the state commission had to wait for the rise of M-256, so that after its examination it would be possible to find out the true causes and circumstances of the tragedy.
The M-256 was lifted by the rescue ship “Kommuna” - a catamaran built in 1915, which by that time had lifted more than one submarine from the bottom. And today the Commune, which will be almost 100 years old by the time this book is published, is still in combat service, being the oldest ship in the entire history of the Russian Navy. Just a few days after the death of the M-256, “Commune” was in the area where the boat was lost, and preparations were actively underway to raise the sunken submarine.
Today, few people know, but several years earlier than the events we are describing, a terrible tragedy occurred on board the Commune itself. The fact is that at that time officers of the Yugoslav Navy, future submariners, were practicing as submarine rescuers. After Stalin quarreled with Josip Broz Tito and called the latter a fascist, Tito also did not remain in debt. Unexpectedly for everyone, a sharp deterioration in relations began between the two fraternal socialist states. Between the Yugoslav officers undergoing training in our Navy, there was also an immediate division into Stalinists and Titoites. The final clarification of the relationship between them, by the will of fate, took place precisely in the wardroom of the “Commune”. It began with a verbal altercation and ended in a massacre, in which several officers were killed and even more wounded. Soon after this, the Titoite officers left the USSR forever, and the Yugoslav officers who remained in the USSR positions asked for political asylum, received it and continued their service in our Navy. Until now, very little is known about the bloody fight of the Yugoslavs in the wardroom of the Commune. However, such a sad fact still took place in the century-old biography of our oldest ship.
Soon the chief designer of the A615 project, A. S. Kassatsier, arrived at the Commune. Having familiarized himself with the general picture of the tragedy, he called for a few delays with the ascent, and then carry it out as carefully as possible, since the possibility of an explosion of the liquid oxygen tank had not yet been ruled out.
At the beginning of October, preparatory work began on raising the M-256. Diving descents began. First, the hull and superstructure were examined. Unfortunately, there were some casualties. On October 2, while carrying out the work of installing a sling on a boat, the foreman of the diving team of the 445th separate ACC division, chief petty officer Vasily Romanenko, tragically died. Death occurred from decompression sickness, which resulted from overwork of the body. Diver Romanenko became the last victim of the M-256.
After the disaster, I often had a question: where did the submariners from the mooring crew go, because they were all tightly tied to the safety line? And almost at the very end of my service at the Naval Academy, an elderly officer came into my office, who, as he said, served on the rescue ship "Agatan" in 1957 and took part in the work of raising our boat. This is what he told me. When the divers descended to the ground to the boat, the first thing they saw was the swaying bodies of the submariners of the mooring crew, who were still tied to the rail. The divers immediately reported what they saw to the top, saying that the dead bodies were interfering with normal work. And then an order came from above to cut off the ends on which the dead submariners were hanging. Now, they say, there’s no time for that, the dead aren’t going anywhere, we’ll raise them later... Of course, then they didn’t find anyone... And were they even looking for them?
The ascent was carried out in several stages. At the first stage, the “Commune” stood over the site of the sinking of the submarine. The hulls were lowered between the hull of the rescue catamaran vessel and secured to the hull of the M-256. The boat was first carefully lifted from the bottom and so, in a suspended state, carefully transported to the roadstead of the Merchant Harbor. She was kept in this condition for 30 days. This pause was again caused by the fear of an explosion in the oxygen tank. According to the calculations of the chief designer, during this time the oxygen from the tank should have been released into the water, and work on the M-256 would have become much safer.
At the same time, a specially selected team of twelve people was formed. It was headed by Captain 3rd Rank Kovalev. Senior Lieutenant Gennady Maslennikov, navigator with the M-255, was appointed assistant commander. The team itself was formed from bilge operators, diesel operators, torpedo operators and helmsmen from submarines of the 70th division, similar to the M-256. Sailors were selected for the special team not only based on their knowledge of their specialty, but also on the basis of their personal psychological qualities, because the team personnel had to do not only hard physical work. They had to endure an incredibly difficult psychological load. Soon, a special team arrived on a boat at the Commune and began preparing for work.
A few days later the third stage began. The "Commune" with the submarine suspended on the guineas, moored on the starboard side at the Northern Pier. After this, immediate preparations for lifting the submarine began. Divers placed two “towels” under the M-256’s hull. Additional guineas were placed and secured onto the “towels.” The next stage was the direct lifting of the submarine, which was carried out for several days during daylight hours and on an even keel. Finally, the control room appeared above the water, and then the hull of the lost submarine. After this, the submarine was secured inside the catamaran hull of the Commune. A ship with an ejector unit approached the rescuer. A preliminary pumping of water was carried out through the open conning hatch. Then the special team went down to the conning tower, freed the lower clearance of the lower conning tower hatch from the corpse stuck there and fixed the hatch in the open state. The search and removal of the remains of the dead sailors began. Complete pumping of water was carried out within two days. The stern, bow, and also the transition hatches from the central post to the 4th compartment were opened. Then additional pumping of water and evacuation of the dead in the 4th and 5th compartments were carried out. After ventilation of the 1st compartment, the transition hatch to the 2nd compartment was opened. This autopsy was carried out in the dark without lighting in order to prevent a possible explosion of the battery in a polluted chloride environment from a directed light source. The remains of the personnel were placed in gunny bags and transferred to a nearby destroyer, where they were placed in the turret of the stern gun. When all the dead were transferred, the destroyer with its flag at half-mast left for Kronstadt.
From a letter from G.S. Maslennikov: “The work itself (meaning the work of the inspection commander) was hard. Evil, cruel towards us in a moral sense, especially when they were “sorting” and putting the remains in bags (after all, the living and dead sailors knew each other very well, serving in the same training detachment and in the same division). What to do if the orderlies called from the hospital could not do this work. Having laid the sailors in bags in the aft gun turret, we pulled the caps off their heads, stood there, wiping the tears that had come involuntarily (only our cheekbones were shaking), without uttering a word. Eternal memory to all of them, without guilt to the guilty.”
After this, a general conversion of the work to seal the submarine was carried out, the vertical rudder was set to 0 degrees. In mid-November, M-256 set off on the tug "Commune" on its last voyage to Kronstadt. Where she was expected to be cut for scrap metal, since it was considered inappropriate to restore the boat after its inspection.
So what happened?
This text is an introductory fragment. From the book Disasters Underwater author Mormul Nikolay GrigorievichIs it possible for Komsomolets to rise? On March 8, 1968, the Pacific Fleet submarine K-129 disappeared during combat service in the Pacific Ocean. For 10 years, the United States secretly prepared an operation to lift it, and in August 1974 they lifted it from a depth of 5,000 meters. After that
From the book The Truth about Religion in Russia author (Yarushevich) NikolaiThe sinking and recovery of the M-351 On October 29, 1955, the largest disaster of a warship in peacetime occurred in the center of Sevastopol Bay at anchor. The flagship of the Black Sea Fleet, the battleship Novorossiysk, was lost - the former Italian Giulio Cesare, which we received from
From the book Secrets of Underwater Warfare, 1914–1945 author Makhov Sergey Petrovich From the book Compartments on Fire author Shigin Vladimir VilenovichMiroslav Morozov TORPEDO ATTACK OF THE SUBMARINE "K-21" ON THE GERMAN BATTLESHIP "TIRPITZ" The attack of the German battleship "Tirpitz" by the Soviet submarine "K-21" on July 5, 1942 is still one of the most controversial episodes in the history of the Soviet Navy in the Great
From the book The First Russian Monitors (collection of articles and documents) by the authorRaising a sunken submarine Already on September 27, 1957, by order of the USSR Minister of Defense No. 0232, a commission was appointed to investigate the circumstances and causes of the death of M-256. Army General Antonov was appointed chairman of the commission, members were vice admirals Ivanov and Komarov,
From the book American Sniper by DeFelice JimInspection of boats and their recovery The first of the divers, the very next day after the disaster, went down inside the sunken submarine B-37, diver midshipman Pashchenko. From his story: “Having descended into the wheelhouse, I found myself in the hatch shaft. The tube was down. I picked it up and stopped it.
From the book War in the Caucasus. Fracture. Memoirs of the commander of an artillery division of mountain rangers. 1942–1943 author Ernsthausen Adolf vonAppendix No. 3 Raising the sunken armored boat “Smerch” (From the magazine “Sea Collection” No. 12 for 1865) On July 24, while with the training squadron of the Naval Corps at Gangeudda, I received an order from His Imperial Highness the Admiral General to set off with all the ships
From the book German submarines Type XXIII close-up author Ivanov S.V. From the book Sailing Ships. History of navigation and shipbuilding from ancient times to the 19th century author Anderson Roger CharlesRise, comrades! Week after week passed, but nothing happened, although we were all waiting for the order to attack. One evening I was sitting with several officers at the rough-hewn table of our room. We drank vodka, the room was filled with thick tobacco smoke. Everyone spoke
From the book Submariner No. 1 Alexander Marinesko. Documentary portrait, 1941–1945 author Morozov Miroslav EduardovichDesign of the XXIII series submarine In the spring of 1943, the Walter company designed a small submarine with a steam-gas power plant. This was a power plant previously intended for the XVII series submarine with a displacement of 300 tons, but reduced by half. Small submarine
From the book The First Battleships of Germany author Bystrov Alexey AlexandrovichChapter 7. The emergence and rise of ships with full sail equipment 1400–1600 At the beginning of the 15th century, large ocean sailing ships had one mast and one sail. Fifty years later they already had three masts and five or six sails. Unfortunately, such big changes have occurred in
From the author's book From the author's book From the author's bookDocument No. 3.4 Report on the voyage of the submarine M-96 from August 9 to August 25, 1942 I report that going to the position (in the Tallinn-Helsinki area) and returning back from the position, I adhered strictly to the recommended courses, excluding the area of Gogland Island, which was abandoned to the south. On the way to
From the author's bookDocument No. 5.16 Political report No. 15 cc “On party-political work in the combat campaign of the submarine S-13 of the submarine brigade of the Red Banner Baltic Fleet in 1944” The submarine S-13 under the command of captain 1st rank Alexander Ivanovich Marinesko, fulfilling a combat order, was on a combat campaign with October 1
From the author's bookAppendix No. 3 Raising the German battleship “Grosser Kurfurst” (From the magazine “Sea Collection” No. 8 for 1879) Work on raising this battleship began in late May. Research carried out by divers found that the position of the ship's hull was not at all
The idea of the combat use of an underwater vessel was first expressed by Leonardo da Vinci. He subsequently destroyed his project because he feared the devastating consequences of submarine warfare. The idea of using a submarine in combat was popularized in Jules Verne's novel 20 Thousand Leagues Under the Sea, written in 1870. The novel describes the Nautilus submarine, which rams and destroys surface ships.
Although the most important tactical property and advantage of a submarine is stealth, until 1944 all submarines spent most of their time on the surface and were essentially submersible boats - surface ships.
Today we will remember the largest submarine disasters, because sometimes these metal monsters go under water forever...
US Navy submarine SS-109 (1927)
40 people died when the US submarine SS-109 (USS S-4) sank after it was rammed by a US Coast Guard ship off Cape Cod.
An amazing fact: the submarine returned to service a year after this accident and served actively until its decommissioning in 1936.
Soviet submarine S-117 "Pike", 1952
"Shch-117" is a Soviet diesel-electric torpedo submarine from the Second World War, belongs to the V-bis series of the Shch - "Pike" project. On June 10, 1949, renamed S-117.
Shch-117, 1930s:
By the early fifties, the S-117 was no longer a new ship, but it successfully performed the tasks assigned to it. In December 1952, in the Sea of Japan, the Pike was supposed to take part in exercises. On the way to the maneuver area, its commander reported that due to a breakdown of the right diesel engine, the submarine was going to the designated point on one engine. A few hours later he reported that the problem had been fixed. The boat never made contact again.
The exact cause and place of death of the submarine are unknown. It was as if she had disappeared.
There were 52 crew members on board the boat, including 12 officers. Searches for the C-117, carried out until 1953, yielded nothing. The cause and place of the boat's death are still unknown.
US Navy submarine USS Thrasher, 1963
An American submarine sank during a training exercise off the Cape Cod Peninsula off the coast of Massachusetts, killing 129 crew members.
Mechanical failure caused the boat to quickly sink and explode. According to the conclusions made by expert Bruce Rule, who examined the death of the boat, the final destruction of the Thresher’s hull occurred at a depth of 732 m and took no more than 0.1 seconds. Its wreckage was discovered at a depth of more than 2,500 meters. The boat's hull split into six main parts - the bow section, the sonar dome, the wheelhouse, the tail section, the engine room, and the command compartment, all located within a radius of 300 meters.
Photo of the Thrasher's vertical rudder lying on the bottom:
The sinking of the Soviet submarine K-129, 1968
The diesel submarine of the USSR Navy K-129, which, according to various sources, carried from 96 to 98 crew members, went on combat duty in the North Pacific Ocean in February 1968.
On March 8, 1968, the diesel-electric missile submarine K-129 from the Pacific Fleet, equipped with nuclear warheads, was lost. The submarine carried out combat service in the Hawaiian Islands, and since March 8 it has stopped communicating. According to various sources, there were from 96 to 98 crew members on board the K-129, all of them died.
The cause of the disaster is unknown. There are a number of theories regarding the accident, including a collision with an American ship, but Washington has consistently denied this, and, according to the official US Navy report, the sinking of the Soviet submarine was blamed on a “tragic explosion on board.” Subsequently, the Americans discovered K-129 and recovered it in 1974.
The Soviet side organized a search for the missing submarine, which did not bring any results. Subsequently, K-129 was discovered by the Americans, who organized its recovery.
Submarine K-129 at the bottom:
During the rise, the submarine broke in two, but several of its compartments were delivered to one of the US Navy bases. During their examination, the bodies of six Soviet submariners were discovered. The Americans gave military honors to the dead and buried the dead submariners at sea.
American USS Scorpion (SSN-589), 1968
The keel of the US Navy ship took place on August 20, 1958. The boat sank on May 21, 1968, 740 km southwest of the Azores at a depth of 3,000 meters, 5 days before returning to base in Norfolk. 99 people died.
They searched for the sunken boat for 5 months; more than 60 ships and vessels, and up to 30 aircraft were involved in the search. A week after the search began, a German submarine, sunk during the Second World War, was discovered 100 miles from Norfolk. The search was in vain for a long time.
Soon the boat was found at a depth of 3047 meters and photographed by the Mizar vessel. The cause of the ship's death has not yet been established; the most likely version is a torpedo explosion. But there are other versions...
For almost 40 years, by mutual agreement, the United States and Russia have been carefully concealing the fact of the destruction of the American nuclear submarine Scorpion by a combat torpedo fired by a Soviet submarine, says the author of the new investigative book “Scorpion Down” published in the United States, military journalist Ed Offley.
Offley claims that the destruction of the Scorpion was the “revenge” of Soviet submariners who believed that the United States was involved in the death of the Soviet submarine K-129, which sank to the bottom after an explosion on board with its entire crew of 98 people in the Pacific Ocean in March 1968.
The tragedies of 1968 were part of an underwater “reconnaissance war,” many of the details of which are still classified, the author of the book believes.
Fragment of a boat hull. Visible deformations from excessive pressure:
Soviet submarine K-8, 1970
The Soviet nuclear submarine K-8 of Project 627A “Kit” joined the Northern Fleet on August 31, 1960.
The submarine, which was on combat duty in the Mediterranean Sea, was sent to the North Atlantic region to participate in the largest exercise in the history of the Soviet Navy, Ocean-70, in which the forces of all USSR fleets participated. Its task was to designate the “enemy’s” submarine forces breaking through to the shores of the Soviet Union. The start of the exercises was planned for April 14, the end - for the 100th anniversary of the birth of V.I. Lenin - April 22, 1970.
The last hours of the life of K-8 and part of her crew:
The nuclear submarine K-8 was lost on April 12, 1970 in the Bay of Biscay of the Atlantic Ocean as a result of a severe fire, which led to the loss of buoyancy and longitudinal stability. The submarine sank at a depth of 4680 meters, 490 km northwest of Spain. 52 crew members were killed. While dying, they managed to shut down the nuclear reactors.
Monument to the K-8 crew:
The death of K-8 and 52 crew members was the first loss of the Soviet nuclear fleet.
Nuclear submarine K-278 "Komsomolets", 1989
The Soviet 3rd generation nuclear submarine K-278 Komsomolets was the only submarine of Project 685 Plavnik. The boat holds the absolute record for diving depth among submarines - 1027 meters (August 4, 1985). The boat had six bow 533-mm torpedo tubes with a quick loader. Each TA had an autonomous pneumohydraulic firing device. Shooting could be carried out at all diving depths.
The nuclear submarine K-278 Komsomolets sank on April 7, 1989 in the Norwegian Sea. The submarine was moving at a depth of 380 meters at a speed of 8 knots. As a result of a fire in two adjacent compartments, the main ballast tank systems were destroyed, through which the boat was flooded with sea water. 42 people died, many from hypothermia.
Russian submarine "Kursk, 2000"
K-141 "Kursk" is a Russian nuclear submarine missile-carrying cruiser of Project 949A "Antey". Laid down at Sevmash in 1990 and put into operation on December 30, 1994.
The Russian submarine Kursk sank on August 12, 2000, at a depth of 108 meters during naval exercises in the Barents Sea, in waters between Norway and Russia, after two explosions occurred on board caused by a torpedo motor fuel leak.
Most of the 118 people on board were killed instantly. 23 people managed to get out into the rear compartment, but died of suffocation the next day.
In terms of the number of deaths, the accident became the second in the post-war history of the Russian submarine fleet after the explosion of ammunition on a B-37.
All stages of the operation to raise the Kursk were carried out over the course of a year. About 120 companies from 20 countries were involved in it. The cost of the work was estimated at 65 - 130 million US dollars. As a result of the operation of raising the Kursk boat, 115 bodies of dead submariners were found and buried. Three bodies were never found. A boat's potentially dangerous ammunition and two nuclear reactors were evacuated from the bottom of the Barents Sea
Chinese submarine "Min 361", 2003
The submarine was launched in 1995. Assigned to the Eastern Fleet of the People's Republic of China Navy
On April 16, 2003, during an exercise, the diesel engine of the Min 361 submarine broke down while it was in Bohai Bay in the Yellow Sea off the northeastern coast of China. The breakdown led to a sharp decrease in oxygen on board and suffocation of all 70 crew members.
This was the first time China has made public the death of its diesel-electric submarine. According to Xinhua on May 2, 2003, the boat was discovered by Chinese fishermen on April 25, 2003, when they caught its periscope with nets. The submarine was later raised to the surface and towed away.
Argentine submarine "San Juan", 2017
The Argentine Navy submarine San Juan stopped communicating on November 15 while en route from the Ushuaia naval base to Mar del Plata. At the time of the last communication session, the submarine reported an accident. There were 44 people on board.
15 days after the disappearance of the submarine, the Argentine Navy announced that the operation to rescue the 44 crew members of the San Juan submarine was being stopped, but the search for the submarine itself would continue.
The captain of the missing Argentine Navy submarine San Juan promised his mother that this would be his last voyage. That's how it happened.
As for nuclear submarines, a total of 8 nuclear submarines sank from 1955 to 2017: 4 Soviet, 2 Russian, 2 American. All of them died as a result of various accidents: three due to technical malfunctions, two as a result of fires, two due to problems with weapons, the cause of the death of one boat is not reliably known.
The mystery of the death of the submarine K-129
On February 24, 1968, the diesel submarine K-129 (side number 574) left its base in the eastern part of the Pacific Ocean, carrying on board three R-13 ballistic missiles with underwater launch and high-power nuclear warheads, as well as two torpedoes with nuclear charges. Two weeks later, at the turning point of her route, 12 thousand miles from the coast of Kamchatka and 350 miles north of the Hawaiian Islands, for unknown reasons, she did not make contact...
An iron curtain hung over the mystery of the disappearance of K-129. The press remained deathly silent. Officers of the Pacific Fleet were prohibited from having any conversations on this topic.
To lift the curtain on the mystery of the submarine’s death, we need to go back 45 years, when all the participants in this tragedy were still alive.
K-129 should not have gone to sea then, because only a month and a half before this tragedy she returned from a planned cruise. The crew was exhausted by the long raid, and the equipment required restoration. However, the submarine, which was about to set sail, was not ready for the trip. In this regard, the command of the Pacific Fleet decided to send the K-129 on patrol again instead. The situation developed according to the principle “for myself and for that guy.” It is still not known whether the commander of the unprepared submarine was punished. It is only clear that by his sloppiness he saved not only his life, but also the lives of all the members of the crew entrusted to him. But at what cost!
K-129 urgently began preparing a new campaign. Only some of the officers were recalled from vacation. The missing crew was forced to be supplemented with specialists from other submarines. In addition, a group of student sailors from the submarine was accepted on board. Witnesses of those events recall that the crew went to sea in a bad mood. The submarine left land from the bay, the name of which was translated from French as “Tomb.”
On March 8, 1968, the operational duty officer at the central command post of the Navy announced the alarm - the K-129 did not give a signal to pass the control line, due to the combat order. And it immediately became clear that the squadron’s command post did not even have a crew list signed personally by the submarine commander and certified by the ship’s seal. From a military point of view, this is a serious crime.
From mid-March to May 1968, an operation of unprecedented scope and secrecy was carried out to search for the missing submarine, in which dozens of ships of the Kamchatka Flotilla and aviation of the Northern Fleet were involved. They searched persistently at the calculated point of route K-129. The faint hope that the submarine was drifting on the surface, without power and radio communications, did not materialize two weeks later. The overcrowding of the airwaves with constant negotiations attracted the attention of the Americans, who accurately indicated the coordinates of a large oil slick in the ocean located in Soviet waters. Chemical analysis showed that the stain was solar and identical to the fuel used on submarines of the USSR Navy. The exact location of the death of K-129 in official documents was designated as point “K”.
The search for the submarine continued for 73 days. After their completion, the relatives and friends of all crew members received funerals with the cynical entry “recognized dead.” It was as if they had forgotten about the 98 submariners. And the Commander-in-Chief of the USSR Navy, S.G. Gorshkov, made an unprecedented statement, refusing to acknowledge the death of the submarine and the entire crew. The USSR government's official abandonment of the sunken K-129 resulted in it becoming "orphan property", thus any country that discovered the missing submarine would be considered its owner. And of course, everything that is inside the underwater ship. If we take into account that in those days all submarines leaving on a voyage from the shores of the USSR had their numbers painted over, then if discovered, the K-129 would not even have identification marks.
However, to investigate the causes of the death of the submarine K?129, two commissions were created: the government one under the leadership of the Chairman of the Council of Ministers of the USSR L. Smirnov and the Navy, which was headed by one of the most experienced submariners, First Deputy Commander-in-Chief of the Navy V. Kasatonov. The conclusions reached by both commissions were similar. They admitted that the submarine crew was not to blame for the death of the ship.
The most reliable cause of the disaster could have been a failure to a depth below the maximum due to freezing of the float valve of the RDP air shaft (operating mode of diesel engines under water). Indirect confirmation of this version was that the command of the fleet headquarters ordered commanders to use the RDP mode as much as possible. Subsequently, the percentage of sailing time in this mode became one of the criteria for successfully completing the mission tasks. It should be noted that the K-129 has never lagged behind in this indicator during long-term voyages at extreme depths. The second official version was a collision with a foreign submarine while underwater.
In addition to the official ones, there were a number of unofficial versions expressed over the years by various experts: a collision with a surface vessel or transport at periscope depth; failure to depths exceeding the maximum immersion depth and, as a result, a violation of the design strength of the hull; the impact of internal ocean waves on the slope (the nature of which has not yet been precisely established); explosion of a rechargeable battery (AB) during charging as a result of exceeding the permissible hydrogen concentration (American version).
In 1998, the book “The Game of Blind Man's Bluff” by Sherry Sontag and Christopher Drew was published in the United States. The Unknown History of American Underwater Espionage." It presented three main versions of the death of the K-129: the crew lost control; a technical accident that developed into a catastrophe (explosion of a battery); collision with another ship.
The version of the AB explosion on a submarine was obviously false, because throughout the history of the world's submarine fleets many such explosions have been recorded, but none of them resulted in the destruction of the durable hulls of the boats, at least due to sea water.
The most plausible and proven version is the collision of the K-129 submarine with the American submarine Swordfish (translated as “swordfish”). Its name alone makes it possible to imagine the structure of this submarine, the conning tower of which is protected by two “fins” similar to sharks. The same version is confirmed by photographs taken at the site of the death of K-129 from the American nuclear submarine Helly-Bat using the Glomar Explorer deep-sea vehicle. They depict the hull of a Soviet submarine, on which a narrow, deep hole is visible on the left side in the area of the bulkhead between the second and third compartments. The boat itself lay on the ground on an even keel, which meant that the collision occurred when it was under water at a depth safe for a ramming attack by a surface ship. Apparently, the Swordfish, which was tracking the Soviet submarine, lost hydroacoustic contact, which forced it to follow the K-129 location, and the short-term restoration of contact between them a few minutes before the collision could no longer prevent the tragedy.
Although now this version is also being criticized. Journalist of the newspaper “Top Secret” A. Mozgovoy rejects it, citing primarily the damage to the K-129, because the Swordfish’s roll angle did not allow it to cause such damage to the Soviet submarine. A. Mozgovoy defends the version that K-129 died as a result of a collision with a surface vehicle. And there is evidence for this too, although the same “swordfish” appears in them again. In the spring of 1968, reports began to appear in the foreign press that a few days after the disappearance of the K-129 submarine, the Swordfish entered the Japanese port of Yokosuka with a crumpled conning tower fence and began emergency repairs. The entire operation was classified. The boat was under repair for only one night, during which it was given cosmetic repairs: patches were applied, the hull was tinted. In the morning she left the parking lot, and the crew signed a non-disclosure agreement. After this incident, Swordfish did not set sail for a year and a half.
The Americans tried to explain the fact that their submarine was damaged by its collision with an iceberg, which was clearly not true, since icebergs are not found in the central part of the ocean in March. And in general, they do not “swim” into this area even at the end of winter, let alone in the spring.
Also in defense of the version of the collision between two submarines is the fact that the Americans surprisingly accurately and quickly determined the location of the death of the K-129. At that time, the possibility of detecting it with the help of an American satellite was excluded, however, they indicated the area with an accuracy of 1-3 miles, which, according to military experts, could only be established by a submarine located in the same zone.
Between 1968 and 1973, the Americans examined the site of the death of K-129, its position and the condition of the hull with the deep-sea bathyscaphe Trieste-2 (according to other sources, Mizar), which allowed the CIA to conclude that the Soviet submarine could be raised. The CIA developed a secret operation codenamed "Jennifer". All this was carried out in the hope of obtaining encryption documents, combat packages and radio communication equipment and using this information to read the entire radio traffic of the Soviet fleet, which would make it possible to open the deployment and control system of the USSR Navy. And most importantly, it made it possible to find the key fundamentals of cipher development. Due to the genuine interest in Soviet missile and nuclear weapons during the Cold War, such information was of particular value. Only three high-ranking officials in the United States were aware of the operation: President Richard Nixon, CIA Director William Colby and billionaire Howard Hughes, who financed the work. Their preparation took almost seven years, and the costs amounted to about $350 million.
To lift the K-129 hull, two special vessels were designed: the Glomar Explorer and the NSS-1 docking chamber, which had a sliding bottom equipped with giant gripping pincers, reminiscent of the shape of the hull of a Soviet submarine. Both ships were manufactured in parts at different shipyards on the west and east coasts of the United States, as if repeating the tactics of creating Captain Nemo's Nautilus. It is also important that even during final assembly the engineers had no idea about the purpose of these ships. All work was carried out in complete secrecy.
But no matter how much the CIA tried to classify this operation, the activity of American ships in a certain place in the Pacific Ocean did not go unnoticed. The Chief of the USSR Navy, Vice Admiral I.N. Khurs, received a code message that the American ship Glomar Explorer was completing the preparatory work for raising the K-129. However, he answered the following: “I draw your attention to better implementation of planned tasks.” This basically meant: don’t interfere with your nonsense, but mind your own business.
As it later became known, a letter with the following content was planted under the door of the Soviet embassy in Washington: “In the near future, US intelligence agencies will take action to covertly raise a Soviet submarine that sank in the Pacific Ocean. Well-wisher."
The operation to raise the K-129 was technically very difficult, since the boat rested at a depth of more than 5000 m. The entire work lasted 40 days. During the lifting, the Soviet submarine broke into two pieces, so only one was able to be lifted, consisting of the first, second and part of the third compartments. The Americans rejoiced.
The bodies of six dead submariners were removed from the bow of the ship and buried at sea according to the ritual accepted in the Soviet fleet. The sarcophagus with the bodies was covered with the flag of the USSR Navy and lowered into the sea to the sounds of the national anthem of the Soviet Union. Having paid their last respects to the Soviet sailors, the Americans began to search for the ciphers that interested them so much, but did not achieve their desired goal. The reason for everything was the Russian mentality: during the repair of the K-129 in 1966–1967 in the city of Dalzavod, the chief builder, at the request of the submarine commander, Captain 1st Rank V. Kobzar, moved the code room to the missile compartment. He could not refuse this tall, tightly built man, who was suffering in the cramped and tiny cabin of the second compartment, and therefore retreated from the project.
But the secret of raising the sunken submarine was not respected. An international scandal erupted around Operation Jennifer. The work had to be curtailed, and the CIA never got to the rear of the K-129.
Soon the main actors who organized this operation also left the political arena: Richard Nixon was removed from his post in connection with the Watergate scandal; Howard Hughes went crazy; William Colby left intelligence for unknown reasons. Congress prohibited the CIA from further engaging in such dubious operations.
The only thing that the homeland did for the dead submariners after the lifting of the boat was that the USSR Ministry of Foreign Affairs sent a note to the US State Department in which it accused the Americans of violating international maritime law (raising an alien ship from the ocean floor) and desecrating the mass grave of sailors. However, neither one nor the other had any legal basis.
Only in October 1992, the film on which the burial of six bodies of Soviet submariners was filmed was handed over to Boris Yeltsin, but did not provide any information shedding light on the causes of the tragedy.
Later, the American-Russian film “The Tragedy of the Submarine K-129” was shot, which reveals only twenty-five percent of the factual material, is replete with errors and the embellishment of reality familiar to Americans. There are many half-truths in the film, which are much worse than outright lies.
According to the proposal of the Minister of Defense I. Sergeev, by decree of the President of the Russian Federation of October 20, 1998, all crew members of the K-129 submarine were awarded the Order of Courage (posthumously), but the awards were presented only to eight families of the deceased sailors. In the city of Cheremkhovo, a monument was erected to the heroic submariners of the submarine K-129, who were born and raised in the Irkutsk region.
Thus, the circumstances that led to the tragedy on board the submarine missile carrier are still unknown. His death is considered one of the biggest mysteries of the Cold War period, which unfolded between two superpowers - the USSR and the USA.
This text is an introductory fragment. From the book 100 great disasters author Kubeev Mikhail NikolaevichThe death of the submarine “Thresher” The famous Russian “Tale of Ivan Tsarevich, the Firebird and the Gray Wolf” says: “On the third day, Voron Voronovich flew in and brought with him two vials: in one - living water, in the other - dead, and gave those bubbles to the Gray Wolf... Gray
From the book 100 great disasters author Kubeev Mikhail NikolaevichTHE DEATH OF THE SUBMARINE “THRESHER” The famous Russian “The Tale of Ivan Tsarevich, the Firebird and the Gray Wolf” says: “On the third day, Voron Voronovich arrived and brought with him two vials: in one - living water, in the other - dead, and gave those vials to the Gray Wolf. Gray wolf
author Dotsenko Vitaly Dmitrievich From the book 100 famous disasters author Sklyarenko Valentina MarkovnaCOLLISION OF THE NUCLEAR SUBMARINE K-56 WITH THE RESEARCH VESSEL "ACADEMIC BERG" The collision between a surface vessel and a submarine vessel, which occurred in 1973 in the Sea of Japan, is classified as a navigational accident with serious consequences. 27 people died, from
From the book Raising the Wrecks by Gorse JosephPROTOTYPES OF A MODERN SUBMARINE The Gimnot, the first submarine of modern design, was designed by Dupuy de Lôme for the French Navy and built in 1888. Its cigar-shaped hull is made of
From the book Sea Devils by Lockwood Charles23. Extraction of the submarine "Skate" The Noto Peninsula is located on the western coast of Honshu, approximately in the middle of this island. A sloping mountain range stretches along the peninsula, which has the outline of a boomerang. On the eastern shore of a peninsula extending 30 miles into the sea,
authorThe death of the submarine "Revenge" In the late autumn of 1956, submarines based in Paldiski were preparing to move to Baltiysk and Liepaja. The fact is that Paldiski, located at the mouth of the Gulf of Finland, froze very early, unlike the non-freezing more western
From the book TASS is authorized... to remain silent author Nikolaev Nikolay NikolaevichThe death of the nuclear submarine "Komsomolets" On April 7, 1989, as a result of an accident in the Norwegian Sea at a depth of 1700 m, 180 km southwest of Medvezhy Island and 490 km from the Norwegian coast, the nuclear submarine "Komsomolets" sank. She was on combat duty in
From the book The Tenth Flotilla of the IAS author Borghese ValerioWE ARE FIGHTING THE FIRST CAMPAIGN OF THE SUBMARINE “IRIDE” IN AUGUST 1940 On June 10, 1940, Italy entered the war against England and France on the side of Germany, which had a non-aggression pact with Russia. Naturally, the Italian fleet felt the full brunt of the English
From the book Submarine Commander. British submarines in World War II by Bryant BenChapter 3 I AM A SUBMARINE COMMANDER In order to become a submarine commander, you had to take short-term courses in which you practiced controlling a submarine during an attack. As before, the instruments and equipment were too simple, so success
From the book History of Underwater Espionage against the USSR by Sontag SherryChapter 5 DEATH OF A SUBMARINE May 27, 1968. After a long day of work, John Craven was driving along the Potomac River in a car, returning home, when the radio announced that the submarine Scorpion (hull number SSN-589) was missing along with 99 crew members. By then it had passed
author Frank WolfgangChapter 1 THE BIRTH OF THE SUBMARINE (1624 - 1919) They write here that Cornelius the Son created an invisible eel for the Dutch, and they sailed on it to the port of Dunkirk and sunk all the ships there. Ben Jonson. News Market, Act III, Scene 1 Ben Jonson inserted these lines into the third act of his comedy,
From the book Sea Wolves. German submarines in World War II author Frank WolfgangChapter 3 THE SECOND BIRTH OF THE SUBMARINE (1935 - 1939) The initial cell of the submarine fleet consisted of the Saar mother ship and three “babies” under the command of Lieutenants Grosse, Loos and Freivald. Dönitz established two fundamental principles: first, all learning tasks
From the book Myths and Legends of the Russian Navy author Dotsenko Vitaly DmitrievichTHE LEGENDARY COMMANDER OF THE S-13 SUBMARINE Historians, writers, journalists and naval veterans again began a debate regarding the identity of the commander of the S-13 submarine, Captain 3rd Rank A. I. Marinesko, and his exploits during the Great Patriotic War. On the eve of the 50th anniversary of the victory
author Kovalev Sergey AlekseevichAppendix 1. List of the crew of the submarine D-1, which went to sea on November 13, 1940 1. Lieutenant-Commander Fedor Maksimovich Eltishchev, commander of the submarine D-1 from December 29, 1939. Born on April 8, 1912 in the village of Ilyinki, Bogoroditsky (Uzlovsky) district, Tula region. After
From the book Swastika over Taimyr author Kovalev Sergey AlekseevichAppendix 2. List of submariners who died in the disaster of the submarine Shch-424 on October 20, 1939 1. Military engineer 3rd rank Noritsyn Gennady Fedorovich, commander of the electromechanical sector of the submarine GC-321 (from June 17, 1939 - Shch-424) 2- th Submarine Brigade of the Red Banner Baltic Fleet. According to others
On December 14, 1952, the submarine Shch-117 set out on its last voyage. She went missing.
The reasons for her death have not yet been established. On this occasion, we will talk about six submarines that died under unclear circumstances.
Soviet diesel-electric torpedo submarine of the Second World War, belongs to the V-bis series of the Shch project - “Pike”.
December 14, 1952 Shch-117 went on its last trip as part of the TU-6 exercise to practice attacking targets with a group of submarines. Six submarines of the brigade were supposed to take part in the exercises, and Shch-117 was supposed to guide them towards ships of the mock enemy. On the night of December 14-15, the last communication session took place with the boat, after which it disappeared. There were 52 crew members on board, including 12 officers.
The searches for Shch-117, carried out until 1953, yielded nothing. The cause and place of the boat's death are still unknown.
According to the official version, the cause of death could have been a failure of diesel engines in a storm, an explosion on a floating mine, and others. However, the exact cause has never been established.
American nuclear submarine "Thrasher" sank in the Atlantic Ocean on April 9, 1963. The worst submarine disaster in peacetime claimed the lives of 129 people. On the morning of April 9, the boat left the harbor of Portsmouth, New Hampshire. Then there were vague signals from the submariners that there were “some problems.” After some time, the US military stated that the boat, which was considered missing, sank. The causes of the disaster have not been fully established.
The Thresher nuclear reactor still rests somewhere on the ocean floor. Back on April 11, 1963, the US Navy measured the radioactivity of ocean water. The indicators did not exceed the norm. Senior American officers insist that the reactor is harmless. The depths of the sea cool it and prevent the core from melting, and the active zone is limited by a durable and stainless container.
Diesel-electric submarine of the "Pike" type, Shch-216, was presumed dead but undetected for many years. The submarine was lost on February 16 or 17, 1944. The submarine is believed to have been damaged but its crew struggled desperately to reach the surface.
In the summer of 2013, researchers discovered a boat near Crimea: they saw an exploded compartment and rudders set to the floating position. At the same time, apart from one destroyed compartment, the hull looked intact. Under what circumstances this boat perished has not yet been established.
S-2, a Soviet Series IX diesel-electric torpedo submarine, set sail on 1 January 1940. The S-2 commander, Captain Sokolov, was given the following task: to break into the Gulf of Bothnia and operate on enemy communications. On January 3, 1940, the last signal from S-2 was received. The boat never made contact again; nothing was known for certain about its fate and the fate of the 50 members of its crew.
According to one version, the submarine died on a minefield laid by the Finns in the area to the pier of the lighthouse on Merket Island. The mine explosion version is official. In the history of the Russian fleet, until recently, this boat was listed as missing in action. There was no information about her, her location was unknown.
In the summer of 2009, a group of Swedish divers officially announced the discovery of the Soviet submarine S-2. It turns out that 10 years ago, the lighthouse keeper on the island of Merket Ekerman, who probably observed the destruction of S-2, showed his grandson Ingvald the direction with the words: “There lies a Russian.”
U-209- a medium-sized German Type VIIC submarine from World War II. The boat was laid down on November 28, 1940 and launched on August 28, 1941. The boat entered service on October 11, 1941 under the command of Lieutenant Commander Heinrich Brodda. U-209 was part of the "wolf packs". She sank four ships.
U-209 went missing in May 1943. Until October 1991, historians believed that the cause of death was the attack of the British frigate HMS Jed and the British sloop HMS Sennen on May 19, 1943. However, it later turned out that U-954 was actually killed as a result of this attack. The cause of the death of U-209 remains unclear to this day.
"Kursk"
K-141 "Kursk"- Russian nuclear submarine missile-carrying cruiser Project 949A “Antey”. The boat was put into operation on December 30, 1994. From 1995 to 2000 it was part of the Russian Northern Fleet.
The Kursk sank in the Barents Sea 175 kilometers from Severomorsk, at a depth of 108 meters on August 12, 2000. All 118 crew members were killed. In terms of the number of deaths, the accident became the second in the post-war history of the Russian submarine fleet after the explosion of ammunition on a B-37.
According to the official version, the boat sank due to the explosion of torpedo 65-76A (“Kit”) in torpedo tube No. 4. The cause of the explosion was a leak of torpedo fuel components. However, many experts still disagree with this version. Many experts believe that the boat could have been attacked by a torpedo or collided with a mine from World War II.